Quantifying Credit Allocation Discrepancies in Continuing Professional Development: A Comparative Audit of Ten Accredited CPD Courses Against an Algorithmic Effective-Learning-Words Standard
AICE Research Group · AIEJ 2026; 1(1): 1–14 · DOI: 10.00000/aiej.2026.01.001
A blinded comparative audit of ten randomly selected CPD-accredited courses found that nominal credit allocations diverged from algorithmically derived learning-content estimates by an average of 25–50%, with all ten courses over-credited relative to their measurable instructional substance.
Read full article →